Understanding Performance Management

Understanding Performance Management

Explain formal and informal performance management evaluation in the workplace

Performance Management – A mentor’s role is to guarantee that informal evaluations are conducted regularly in the course of their work relationship and that their employees’ progress can be tracked in real-time. This form of evaluation can be accomplished through job-related conversations, a casual get-together over coffee, or an on-site inspection of a particular piece of work. Employees can benefit from less formal assessments by gaining as much information as possible without causing delays or mistakes.

This increases their chances of changing their behaviour (Aboalshamat et al., 2020). It is possible to avoid such surprises since informal feeds to employees are noted in the official assessment. Formal assessments should never take the place of informal ones, even if the latter is more convenient.

As part of a worker’s yearly performance assessment, this is commonly used for more official discussions between a manager and an employee. Maintaining a fresh annual evaluation is a priority for me as a line manager. This form of evaluation focuses on the employee’s accomplishments as well as their efforts to correct any flaws they may have.

In performance management, explain the job of the first-line manager

It is the first-line manager’s responsibility to make sure that his team accomplishes its goals. A first-line manager is responsible for providing consistent direction to the members of his staff to ensure that his team performs properly and that its members comprehend both their individual and collective goals, as well as how they contribute to the advancement of the business.

When they see their employees succeed, they may promote their feedback and help guide their development (Phillips et al., 2016). As a new employee, you may support them by saying “up to date” to help them feel more confident in their role, or you can give them input or assign them tasks to help them rise to a specific position. As a manager, I believe that performance is just as important, whether it’s a simple “thank you” or a more formal thank you.

Identifying the fundamental reason for a team member’s noncompliance with requirements is critical. Everyone who is straining to deliver resources and equipment should report to you as their first-line manager.

Identify ways to ensure fair and objective formal assessment

To determine remuneration, incentive, promotion, and transfer choices, an assessment of employee performance is necessary. As a result, it has a profound effect on staff morale and motivation (Yu et al., 2020). But when it comes to making judgments on employee transfers, salary, advancement, and recognition, supervisors must use extreme caution. Employee morale suffers when they see their efforts and contributions go unnoticed. The approaches listed below allow managers to conduct performance reviews that are both fair and objective.

Fair Progress System

It is the primary objective of doing an employee evaluation to enhance the performance of the employee and to provide assistance to them. Identifying and correcting implementation hurdles is a joint responsibility of both management and staff ( Bozer et al., 2021). If employees aren’t included in the decision-making process, it might be unreasonable to expect them to return to high levels of performance.

Fair Performance Review

For the assessors to grasp the aims of performance evaluation, the organisation must train them. They should be aware of how the performance review system operates, be able to provide constructive comments and maintain a focus on capabilities and behaviour as opposed to personalities (Yu et al., 2020). When it comes to evaluating their performance, employees should be given the freedom to do so at will.

Fair Report

Even before conducting interviews, managers may reflect on what they’ve seen of their staff in the real world (Bozer et al., 2021). Because a superficial assessment of an employee’s performance cannot provide sufficient and correct information, the management should spend more time observing and recording data to get a more complete picture.

Fair Assessment

Each employee’s job description and how their performance is being evaluated should be clearly stated in an evaluation assessment. Employees and employers benefit from open communication when this type of information is shared.

Explain how to set SMART objectives for a team member

Goals that are measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound are referred to as SMART. An organization’s key success statistics, such as earnings, or the accomplishment of a specific objective are all examples of typical metrics (Jones, 2016).

Good public health practice involves solid objectives to assess improvement in the direction of reaching goals and results. Various programmes and services are supported by awards that involve planning, executing, and achieving goals to guarantee success for future funding. Organizations strive to set meaningful goals that effectively evaluate improvement in the direction of a goal.

  • The aim must be explicit and not vague or nonspecific, e.g., safety
  • To determine whether a project is a success, you must first determine whether it can be measured, e.g., patient care
  • It must be possible to fulfil a goal with the money that is available, e.g., efficiency
  • The goal or target specified is related to the organization’s objectives and will have an impact on the business, e.g., accuracy
  • A date is required to compute the mission’s duration, e.g., learning and development

Explain how to set performance standards for a team member

Managers must keep tabs on and establish expectations for their workers’ performance to help them grow professionally. Both managers and team members should be involved in defining and setting performance criteria to guarantee that everyone is on the same page and ready to commit. There is a greater sense of accountability and incentive when employees have a say in determining their performance criteria.

Evaluation

It is of the utmost importance to analyse and revise the job requirements with the workforce and to discuss the kinds of objectives employees should set for themselves. The benchmark must be measurable so that managers can monitor and compare the performance of their employees over time. Comparing performance amongst employees in the same role is made easier when they are measured using metrics.

Past Data

Before setting new performance objectives, it is critical to undertake a thorough analysis of all available historical data on existing goals.

Keeping track of your progress

Make sure everyone knows what they’re expected to accomplish and how they can help the team achieve it. By the end of the month, for example, the salesman must raise sales by 15%.

Frequent Meetings and Open Debate

Regular meetings to discuss and execute new performance requirements should be held on a monthly or every six-week cycle, as appropriate. The end-of-month meeting at Milltech, for example, is used to discuss issues and areas that require development. Regular meetings allow team members to share their thoughts and suggestions for enhancing their work performance.

Performance Management HRM Project
Performance Management HRM Project

Explain how to measure performance against agreed standards

Continual Examination

Many businesses choose to conduct performance evaluations regularly rather than once every few months or once a year. As a result, regular feedback aids in the early detection of issues and the implementation of corrective measures before they worsen.

Checklist

With the use of a checklist, it is simple to track employee performance and identify those employees who are under-performing and may require more support. In addition, it aids in identifying people who require further education and training to perform at a higher level.

Self-Evaluation

To get the greatest results, you should ask your staff to do a self-assessment. Employees who are held accountable for their work may be more concerned about it than the team’s leaders. With the use of this exam, team leaders may help their employees better understand how well they’re performing.

360 Feedback

Using the system, employees from all departments and levels of the organisation may provide input on their ideas, thoughts, comments, and assessments of their performance. When using 360- degree feedback, you may assess input from a wide range of sources, allowing you to see both good and negative trends as well as areas in need of improvement.

Visual Ratings

When it comes to evaluating employee performance, the typical graphical scale employs the digits 1-10. Decision-making and comprehending certain activities can be placed on a scale of one to ten.

Explain the importance of feedback to improve performance

Achieve the expected results and obtain timely feedback from your team members by clearly defining their roles and responsibilities. You’ll gain more self-confidence and feel better about your work if you conduct daily evaluations. It would be a wonderful learning experience for the team member to take advice on failures and faults so that they may reflect on whatever went down and what they can do to avoid making the same mistake again ( Yu et al., 2020).

You must communicate clearly and succinctly with anyone who isn’t meeting the basic criteria of success to be conscious of the necessity for change, and it’s also an excellent beginning point for an open debate about productivity and what the group member can do to improve performance with the support of the manager.

Describe how to give effective feedback during performance management reviews

As a manager, I prefer to use the CORBS feedback approach when I must give an employee feedback.

  • Make a concise and unambiguous description of the situation or actions
  • If you’re referring to someone else, use terms and vocabulary like “I feel,” “I believe,” or “you are” instead of “you.”
  • The default behaviour is to deliver the information to the case in the simplest form imaginable so that it will be remembered
  • In place of having things go in one direction alone, it is healthy to incorporate both negative and positive feedback
  • At its most fundamental, the feedback should be concentrated on the enforcement
  • When confronted with negative feedback in the structured framework, I turn to the BEEF model for support
  • How a person acts or behaves is known as their comportment
  • A single illustration of a problem or activity is referred to as an example
  • The impact is either the impact that something has on someone else or the consequence of something happening
  • You can have everything you desire in the future, starting right now

Identify potential areas of under-performance in the workplace

Since under-performance may be so costly and detrimental, any organisation should consider addressing the issue. Under-performance can be caused by a variety of factors, including the following:

Lack Of Space For Growth

It’s not uncommon to have employees that don’t care about their performance and are content to show in, do their thing, and go home. Others, on the other hand, are aware of the company’s potential for growth. The lack of room for advancement can have a detrimental influence on an employee’s overall performance. Consequently.

Motivation

There are several common workplace issues, such as employee dissatisfaction, that contribute to under-performance.

Inspiration

It’s impossible to expect good performance from personnel if they aren’t enthused about what they do. Having inspiring executives in the firm, for example, can lead to more motivated employees, which can have a favourable effect on productivity.

A Lack Of Praise And Acknowledgement

When employees feel valued and recognised via the use of incentives, they are more productive. They may, for example, decide to leave and seek employment with another satisfying organisation.

Inadequate Leadership and Effective Performance Management

Disengaged and disorganised managers are less expected to provide a positive work environment, which in turn has a negative influence on team performance and productivity.

Determine the root reasons for performance management shortfalls

An essential part of training is A member of staff who may not be equipped to do their tasks due to a lack of relevant experience or competence. Adding a new task or having a new employee who is unable to learn how to do this work might be to blame.

An example of an impetus is someone on the team who is qualified yet unable to do their duties. Lack of rapport with the supervisor, disinterest in routine tasks, or an unwillingness to complete them is all possible explanations (Bozer et al., 2021). A problem with capacity occurs when a person in our team is doing everything they can and knows to do to finish their task, yet it is still not enough.

This may be the result of problems at work or home, both of which hurt the individual’s performance at work. A systematic problem, such as several teams that don’t operate properly. It’s possible that sharing information or providing services can cause you some headaches.

Describe actions to restore performance management to acceptable levels

To get the results back on track, you need to identify and address the error with your teammate. You should gather evidence to support your claims of under-performance. Recommendation: Copies of previous assessments, ideas, and proposals to enhance performance have also been suggested (Crocker et al., 2016).

A meeting with your team member is necessary once the data has been collected so that you may explain your findings and present the proof you’ve gathered. Try to interact with the member of the team and listen to what they have to say because they are already familiar with the problem and have ideas about how it may be improved. It is possible to work out a plan of action with your supervisor and your team member after this initial discussion (Green et al., 2020).

Retraining on a new task, mentorship and supervision from managers, or a reduction in the workload of team members are all options. Team members who fail to follow and finish this approach, such as through disciplinary measures that might lead to their dismissal, must be fully informed of the consequences.

References

Aboalshamat, K., Al-Zaidi, D., Jawa, D., Al-Harbi, H., Alharbi, R. and Al-Otaibi, S., 2020. The effect of life coaching on psychological distress among dental students: interventional study. BMC psychology, 8(1), pp.1-8.

Arena, D., Perini, S., Taisch, M. and Kiritsis, D., 2018. The Training Data Evaluation Tool: Towards a unified ontology-based solution for industrial training evaluation. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, pp.219-224.

Bozer, G. and Jones, R.J., 2018. Understanding the factors that determine workplace coaching effectiveness: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(3), pp.342-361.

Bozer, G. and Jones, R.J., 2021. Introduction to the special issue on advances in the psychology of workplace coaching. Applied Psychology, 70(2), pp.411-419.

Crocker, J., Shields, K.F., Venkataramanan, V., Saywell, D. and Bartram, J., 2016. Building capacity for water, sanitation, and hygiene programming: Training evaluation theory applied to CLTS management training in Kenya. Social Science & Medicine, 166, pp.66-76.

Green, S., Grant, A.M. and Rynsaardt, J., 2020. Evidence‐based life coaching for senior high school students: Building hardiness and hope. Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, pp.257-268.

Jones, R., 2016. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance management outcomes; scale development; theoretical model of individual differences and longitudinal study (Doctoral dissertation, Aston University).

Jones, R.J., Woods, S.A. and Guillaume, Y.R., 2016. The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), pp.249-277.

Phillips, J.J. and Phillips, P.P., 2016. Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Routledge.

Yu, N., Collins, C.G., Cavanagh, M., White, K. and Fairbrother, G., 2020. Positive coaching with front-line managers: enhancing their effectiveness and understanding why. Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, pp.269-283.

Relevant Performance Management Posts

Managing Team Performance

Leadership Strategies for Improving Performance Dissertation

HR Dissertation Topics

Did you find any useful knowledge relating to performance management in this post? What are the key facts that grabbed your attention? Let us know in the comments. Thank you.

Effective Team and Performance Management

Effective Team and Performance Management

This article is intended to evaluate the case study on Electron Corporation and highlights main key points pertaining to team building as well as enhancing the effectiveness of team productivity, established team environment and performance. Building of teams and effectiveness of team performance can be derived from various primary attributes (Zaccaro & Klimoski, in press). Teams are firstly needed to successfully contribute their individual efforts because their certain needs and responsibilities will form the basis of the collective success of the team. Secondly, since teams need to operate in complicated and ever changing organizational environments, they need to tackle multiple organizational team characteristics such as conflicting agendas, load of greater information, swift changes in the situations as well as enhanced dynamic changes (Zaccaro, Rittman & Marks 2001).

A small overview of the company includes; Electron is a small manufacturing organization established in 1997 in North of England. It manufactures components for telecommunication division. It employs 150 people along with 90 people in the manufacturing division. It was originally a department of a huge telecommunication organization and the Electron’s team bought the component manufacturing section as a portion of an outsourcing plan presented by the parent company in 2007. Electron has acquired both full time and part-time employees. In 1990s, its management realized that the company was striving for increasing competition and innovation in the industry. So in order to enhance their competition in the market, they have found the need of a more proficient and effective production procedures while emphasizing on enhancing organization’s culture, customer services, improved performance and responsibility and loyalty towards teamwork.

However, the subsequent sections of the assignment involve literature review which will cover the benefits and dysfunctions of teamwork. The Tuckman’s (1965) model of team building is also been employed in relation to the case study which demonstrates how teams must be efficiently formed. Whereas, the last sections will demonstrate the conclusion of the study as well recommendations on how to enhance the team performance more effectively and the steps that need to be taken for creating a subtle team environment.

Literature Review

The use of teams seems to provide several advantages; they may not be the most appropriate tactic for all types of organizations and not all of the organizations face similar and all challenges imposed by the teams. The influence of teamwork (both optimistic and pessimistic) is dependent upon several features such as company’s culture and environment, efficiency of team leadership, company’s efforts etc. Primarily, a team can be described as a small group of people along with a set of performance objectives, who are responsible to a common goal and the attitude they carry themselves mutually responsible (Katzenbach & Smith 1993). This definition explains that organizational teams should be of a manageable size and all of the team members should be accountable to achieve the shared team objectives. Moreover, all of the team members should be mutually responsible towards their activities and the results of those activities.

The Enticement of Working with Teams

The power of team work roots from several factors particularly when teams are employed. Various researchers demonstrated that teams are increasingly being employed as a response to ever increasingly global marketing competition (Heap 1996; Roufaiel & Meissner 1995; Sundstrom, De Meuse & Futrell 1990). Because of this increase in competition, it is also viewed that catering niche markets is also a growing concern. Since, electron emphasizes on enhancing organization’s culture, customer services and improved productivity; as a result, Electron manufacturers not only need to compete on cost but also strive to compete on innovation by establishing distinctive goods and services that could not be countered by the other rivals in the market. However, this will originate a problem where the company is not supposed to rely on mass production as well as economies of scale in the industry.

Most organizations still believe that working with teams is the only answer to this problem (just as Electron did). In their view teams are the source to optimize company’s innovation as employees have increased self-sufficiency, increased involvement and autonomy for making decisions (Harvey, Millet & Smith 1998). The employees no longer need to be guided about what is required to be done. In fact, they are provided with the objectives or develop objectives along with their team leader and then give autonomy to choose the best way in order to accomplish those objectives. Additionally, organizational innovation can also be optimized if teams are able to provide other enticements to the organization the situation in which they operate.

For instance, firstly, teams can optimally utilize human resources since they permit companies to achieve access to a person’s knowledge and capabilities (IRS Employment Review 1995). Albeit, the enhanced intricacy of the companies means that not all the managers know everything regarding each and every facet of the company’s operations. In this circumstance, it is important to utilize knowledge and capabilities of the employees/teams. Secondly, teams can be utilized to optimize company’s learning as employees are capable to design best strategies being suited to their work objectives (Wageman 1997). Thirdly, Teams are also capable to enhance individual’s performance levels and his/her efficiency, thereby establishing a synergy (Katzenbach & Smith 1993). Finally, team work is greatly associated with various numbers of objectives, tasks and additional accountability for each member of the team, which in turn resulted in enhanced job satisfaction, employee motivation and more work commitment. This will also result in lower employee turnover and absenteeism, thus, decreasing company’s costs and enhancing company’s knowledge base (Kirkman & Shapiro 1997).

Dysfunctions or Challenges Accompanied Teamwork

The employment of teams is primarily a change to an organization as well as a developmental procedure. Thus, teams can be easily affected to any challenge that might emerge during an organizational change. Particularly, resistance among employees may occur when they are needed to work along with other employees who are unfamiliar to them. In this way, teams are more likely to have broken established social relationships. This has already done in the Electron when huge number of new employees was hired and was integrated into one of the Electron’s teams. Those workers were new to their team’s values and consensus where they exerted greater challenge to the already existed relationships among the older employees.

In accordance to Bettenhausen (1991), one way to cope this problem is by forming teams. Building of teams will enhance group productivity by enhancing communication, minimizing conflicts and establishing greater bonds and commitment among all the working team members. Resistance among employee can also occur as a result of other factors. For instance, teamwork may need job enlargement where each team member is required to perform his/her conventional role along with his/her team role (IRS Employment Review 1995). In this circumstance, it is essential to minimize their certain responsibilities or to change the structure of their rewards or compensation.

Besides job enlargement, team work is also coherent with autonomy, ownership and additional commitments. Managers frequently perceive that employees must participate in decision making instead of simply being directed of what needs to be done. However, this might be true for certain situations but not for all situations. This will, in turn, may resulted in employee job dissatisfaction, increased employee turnover and/or reduced work productivity. The similar case is also viewed in Electron, when it hired new employees on temporary basis and let the managers to decide who must be hired on as full-time employee. Those workers initially were also unfamiliar with the team procedures and were expected by the managers to know the team’s values and conform and act accordingly to their team’s norms. Teams at Electron started exerting their concertive control over the new individuals which as a result new employees began controlling themselves and those norms and values become rationalized rules for the new members. There is no simple solution for catering such problem; however, training or changing positions can be probable within the company.

Other associated problems with “empowered teams” originate when there is a lack of trust in the team when they are no longer trusted enough to participate in decision making. This will result in teams and organizations losing full potential to accomplish their desired objectives. The situations in which teams are needed to seek consent before executing any idea or timeliness, ownership is likely to reduce. Organizational innovation will also decrease as teams are compelled to suggest ideas that will be likely to accept (Nahavandi & Aranda 1994). Moreover, team members may also perceive that their management is paying insincere respect to their proposed ideas of teamwork which will certainly result in reduced employee morale.

It is also viewed that when teams are involved in making decisions, they take more time than the system they reinstate. This is also needed where team coordination is required and where team members are independent. This issue can be partly cope by the formation of the team, but this also requires continuous training and development of groups teams. Such kind of training can be specifically appropriate for the new hired staff as there may be no established procedures for them to follow. Also, for effective teams, there must be strong coordination among them (Harvey, Millet & Smith 1998). Similarly, the lack of participation in decision making and coordination among employees for building of more strengthened team culture is seen in Electron’s eight teams (red, blue, white, green, silver, aqua, purple and yellow). This is due the fact that the older and long tenured employees have tried to impose strict concertive rules and procedures to conform to the group norms.

In case of organizational environmental changes and developmental initiatives, culture of the organization and environment must also be considered. It must not be perceived that the objectives and values of the individuals are similar to those of their management or congruent even across the entire organization. The attitude of individuals towards teams will demonstrate the success of those teams. If teams need to be executed more successfully, the extension of already existed values must be there (Carr 1992). Therefore, Electron when working with teams also demand shift in attitudes that a company may turn to it when it wants to accomplish a cultural shift, for instance, when it becomes more quality or customer oriented (IRS Employment Review 1995).

Five Team Development Phases as Proposed by Bruce Tuckman

This model as proposed by Bruce Tuckman (1965) tends to highlight and guides the areas where teams can be successful and/or become failure to achieve desired team goals. For forty years, Tuckman’s classical model of team development delivers ease and new perceptions to managers to either charge to run a team or attempt to function within a team while assuring each member that they are not alone and that the uneasiness is a normal part of the team journey towards an efficient and pleasant unit. Tuckman speculates that these stages are essential and unavoidable. In order for the Electron teams to grow, to face the hurdles, to cope up with the problems, to search for solutions, to organize work and to deliver desired outcomes; these five phases can be elaborated as follows.

Phase One: Forming

In this first phase of team building, Electron teams must be formed. Where the attitude of the individual is driven by the desires which are likely to be accepted by the other individuals and prevent any controversy or conflict. Solemn problems and attitudes are prevented and people are required to concentrate on their busy work routines. Individual members also try to gather knowledge regarding each other, regarding the scope of the task and how to reach it. This phase is considered to be an easy stage but prevention of controversies and conflicts mean that not much objective is actually accomplished. The teams will together meet and learn about various opportunities and confront and then agree on objectives and start to tackle the tasks and objectives. Members of the team will quite behave autonomously.

Each team member must concentrate on his/her team leader by accepting the leader’s guidance and authority while maintaining a respectful distant association with other individuals. At this phase, the leader must open two way communications and be ready to reply any of the queries that may come on his/her way; limitations, potency and vulnerabilities must also be tested including those related to the leader.

Phase Two: Storming

Each Electron group then will enter into the next stage where different ideas for competition are considered. The teams address distinct issues such as what kind of problems they need to solve, how they must function autonomously as well as mutually with each other and which leadership model they must accept to follow. Each team member will have the privilege to confront others’ ideas and perceptions. In most cases storming is solved more quickly while in others, most of the teams never leave this phase (this depends on the maturity of the team). Most team members concentrate on the ins and outs to dodge the problems. This second phase is essential for the teams to grow which could be controversial, distasteful and often excruciating to the team members who are opposed to the conflicts. Tolerance of each team member must also be emphasized because without patience, teams will likely to fail.

This stage can be proved destructive for the teams if they are permitted to go out of control. Managers/supervisors of the teams might be more accessible but need to be directive in their professional and decision making attitudes. The teams therefore, will solve the problems and differences and contribute more comfortably with one another. In this way, they cannot be judged and can share their stand points and ideas easily with each other.

Phase Three: Norming

At this phase of team building, Electron managers will set one objective and one mutual plan for the team to accomplish. Some of the members will be motivated to give up their certain ideas in order for the team to effectively function. At this phase, each team member feels his/her commitment to the team and has the aspiration to work towards the success of the team’s objectives.

Phase Four: Performing

It is probable for certain teams to reach to this stage. The high performing teams can be able to work as one unit as they able to identify best approaches to get their job done mutually, comfortably and without irrelevant controversy or the requirement of any external management because they become motivated and knowledgeable by this stage. When the members of the Electron teams are now skilled, independent and experienced, they can tackle the process of decision making without the burden of any supervision (however, supervisors are also directive and participative at this stage but team make more appropriate decisions). The Electron teams must pass through this stage several times because of the global and organizational dynamic changes.

Phase Five: Adjourning (and Transforming)

This stage involves un-forming the groups which sometimes create a sense of loss often feel by the team members. This stage will include ‘dissolution’ which leads to the end of the Electron team members’ roles and responsibilities, the accomplishment of objectives and minimization of reliance. This procedure can be traumatic specifically when the dissolution is not planned. Thus, team members must be acknowledged at this phase that at the successful achievement of the productivity levels and outcomes, teams will be dissolved and that new teams will emerge for new targets.

Conclusion

In order to execute and sustain teams to operate effectively within the organization, sufficient organizational changes are required to be considered as well as various issues required to be catered. Those changes not only influence team members but also the responsibilities and commitments of the supervisors and managers, the organizational framework, work procedures and techniques and employees’ social bonds. That’s why due to the dynamic environmental changes, Electron manufacturers also face multiple challenges which occur as a result of teams’ implementation. However, it is also evident that in case of teams’ implementation, various organizations will not opt for going back to their prior organizational frameworks (IRS Employment Review 1995). Consequently, it is also seen that teams, in spite of the emerging challenges, are capable enough to offer several advantages to firms in the long run.

In case of Electron manufacturers, new hired team members were unknown of the team’s values, norms and consensus that proved greater challenge to the already existed relationships among the older employees. Moreover, managers were also expecting that each new member must be familiar with the procedures and norms of the groups to act accordingly and conform themselves to those groups. However, besides the implementation of their concertive procedures and motivating employees (by providing them rewards), Electron teams still lacking certain key aspects which formed the basis of a strengthened team. Such as two way communication, participation of employees in decision making, lack of trust among team members, sharing of opinions and ideas among each other to resolve any critical issue regarding production and enhancement of work performances and employees’ morale.

Thus, as a result of this, Bruce Tuckman’s (1965) model of team building is employed in the context of Electron manufacturers. According to his model, teams are to be developed step by step by ensuring performance effectiveness in each team building phase. This model consists of five stages i.e. forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. This can be concluded as Electron must forge its eight teams in a manner such that each individual must know his/her accountability, change his/her attitude according to the organizational culture so that teams will effectively function with minimum conflicts and controversies (forming). Second, teams must be encouraged to share their wide scope ideas and opinions and can confront the other’s ideas for making better decisions and improved productivity (storming).

Third, Electron managers must establish one objective and direct the team to mutually accomplish the objective which enhances the members’ sense of responsibility towards the team success (norming). Forth, when Electron’s team members become more experienced and capable enough, they will be able to make decisions without any supervisor which in turn, gives employees more autonomy, understanding of each other’s roles, increase employee social relationships, enhance their morale as well as enhance work productivity (performing). Finally, when the production target is successfully achieved, teams will be terminated at the final stage so that new teams will be developed to achieve new production targets with the passage of time and make the organization subtle to dynamic industrial changes with the help of new teams’ formation.

Recommendations

Following are some of the recommendations that can be further considered for making organizational teams more strengthened and intensified.

  • In accordance to Tuckman’s strength deployment inventory (SDI) model, employees must be nurtured with the help of managers without directing rewards in return. They must be motivated to enhance their self-worth by accomplishing tasks and other significant orders.
  • Fulk, Bell & Bodie (2011) also employed Tuckman’s five stages of team development to enhance team performance. According to them, the first stage ‘forming’ must also involve hiring and selecting right individuals at the right time who also possess the qualities of solving critical problems, controversies, communication gaps, decision making, setting of plans and goals and organizing tasks within teams.
  • At the second stage ‘storming’, managers must anticipate to unexpected events that are likely to lead the whole team to the conflicts which are likely to arise as a result of differences in opinions, styles of working and priorities. The managers must be vigilant to take all those conflicts into consideration and encourage teams to take appropriate and productive actions towards mitigating those conflicts.
  • The third stage ‘norming’ must involve working with teams with specific as well challenging goals and those goals must be present in writing. Here team performance can be enhanced if teams revisit their initial goals, clarification of the goals and the commitments towards those goals.
  • At the fourth stage ‘performing’, managers must monitor their teams ‘objectives and their feedback on a regular basis in order to enhance teamwork. That feedback must be timely basis as well as concrete to be acted upon.
  • At the final stage ‘adjourning’ the team members instead of felling a sense of loss, team members must be expected to enjoy their success resulted in successful completion of the task.

Bibliography

Bettenhausen, K.L. (1991) ‘Five Years of Group Research: What Have We Learned and What Needs to be Addressed’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 345-381.

Carr, C. (1992) ‘Planning Priorities for Empowered Teams’, Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 43-47.

Fulk, H.K. (2011) Team Management by Objectives: Enhancing Developing Teams’ Performance. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 12(3), 17-26.

Heap, N. (1996) ‘Building the Organisational Team’, Industrial and Commercial Training, vol. 28, no. 3, pp.3-7.

IRS Employment Review (1995) ‘Key Issues in Effective Teamworking’, no. 592, pp. 5-16.

Katzenbach, J.R. & Smith, D.K. 1993, The Wisdom of Teams, McKinsey & Company, New York.

Kirkman, B.L. & Shapiro, D.L. (1997) ‘The Impact of Cultural Values on Employee Resistance to Teams: Toward a Model of Globalised Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 730-757.

Nahavandi, A. & Aranda, E. (1994) ‘Restructuring Teams for the Re-engineering Organization’, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 8. no. 4, pp. 58-68.

Performance Coaching Training (2010) Bruce Tuckman’s Forming, Storming, Norming & Performing Team Development Model.

Roufaiel, N.S. & Meissner, M. (1995) ‘Self-Managing Teams: A Pipeline to Quality and Technology Management, Benchmarking for Quality, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21-37.

Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P. & Futrell, D. (1990) ‘Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness’, American Psychologist, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 120-133.

Teambuilding Solutions (2011) Strength Deployment Inventory (SDI).

Wageman, R. (1997) ‘Critical Success Factors for Creating Superb Self-managing Teams, Organisational Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49-60.

Zaccaro, S. J, Rittman, A.L & Marks, M.A (2001) Team Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451-483.

Appendix A

Performance Management
Performance Management

Effective Team
Effective Team

View Performance Management Dissertation Here